Why motion is taken in opposition to principal and lecturer if examination outcomes are lower than departmental standards: High Court

0
18
Why motion is taken in opposition to principal and lecturer if examination outcomes are lower than departmental standards: High Court


Jaipur : The Rajasthan High Court has issued a discover to the Principal Education Secretary and the Director of Secondary Education and others and sought their response on stopping the wage increment of the Principal and Lecturer on behalf of the division because of their examination outcomes being lower than the departmental standards. A single bench of Justice Anup Dhand gave this order whereas listening to separate petitions filed by Principal Mahendra Tiwari and Lecturer Nemichand.

In the petition, advocate Vijay Pathak advised the court docket that within the yr 2019-20, the petitioner was working as principal in a authorities faculty in Kotkhavda tehsil. When the examination outcomes of two senior academics of the college in Mathematics and English had been beneath the standards, the division withheld the annual wage increment of the petitioner. Challenging this, it was mentioned that if the results of a category is low then it’s fallacious to punish the petitioner as an alternative of the academics educating the involved topic.

Read this additionally – After disposing of a decade and a half outdated case, the High Court ordered fee – Rajasthan High Court

Apart from these examination outcomes, the college has wonderful outcomes yearly. Which proves that there was no negligence on his half. Whereas, within the second petition, it was mentioned on behalf of lecturer Nemichand that he’s a Hindi faculty lecturer in Badhal. In the session 2015-16, his wage increment was stopped because of low leads to his topic, despite the fact that he had taught your entire syllabus.

Apart from this, the studying degree of each pupil can also be not the identical. In such a scenario, he can’t be punished if his examination outcomes are much less in a single yr. While listening to the matter, the one bench has sought reply from the involved officers.



Source link